fourth edition of ASX Corporate Governance Council’s Principles and Recommendations officially released.February 27, 2019

The fourth edition will see the Principles applicable to listed entities on an “if not, why not,” basis for financial years commencing on or after 1 January 2020.

Significant changes from the third edition
While the eight core principles remain largely intact, in total the number of recommendations has grown from 29 to 35, with the most significant changes being those made to Principle 3 – now expressed as “Instil a culture of acting lawfully, ethically and responsibly” – and its constituent recommendations.
While this might not seem like much of a change from the third edition – “Act ethically and responsibly” – the experience of 2018 showed that there had been too many instances where unlawful behaviour went unchecked and unpunished.

Revised or new recommendations to give effect to Principle 3 include requiring entities to:

articulate and disclose their ‘values’ (3.1);
disclose material breaches of codes of conduct to the board or a board committee (3.2);
to have and disclose a whistle-blower policy with material breaches to be reported to the board or a board committee (3.3); and
to have and disclose an anti-bribery policy with material breaches to be reported to the board or a board committee (3.4).
Having in place robust whistleblowing policies will be particularly critical for organisations to prioritise, with new laws being passed by the Federal Parliament on 19 February 2019 that consolidate and broaden existing protections and remedies.

Importantly, the concept of a “social licence to operate” – the subject of heated debate during the public consultation process on the draft – did not find its way into the final version of the Principles. Stakeholder feedback had demonstrated a wide gulf in opinion between those who saw the concept as pivotal to business operating in a broader societal context, and others, like the AICD, who believed that such a subjective term had no place in a quasi-regulatory document.

Ultimately, in the interests of certainty and more consistent market application, the Council decided that references to “social licence to operate” in the consultation draft should be replaced with references to “reputation” and “standing in the community” in the final Principles.

These changes to Principle 3 have been reinforced by revisions under Principle 1 (“Lay solid foundations for management and oversight”) including mandating board charters (Recommendation 1.1), and more detailed articulation of how management and board responsibilities should be split, including the board’s responsibility for defining the entity’s purpose, approving the entity’s statement of values and code of conduct, and satisfying itself that remuneration policies are aligned with the entity’s purpose, values, strategic objectives and risk appetite.

Timely information
Commissioner Hayne’s incontrovertible statement that “Boards cannot operate properly without having the right information. And boards do not operate effectively if they do not challenge management”, is also referenced.

Importantly, following on from the Financial Services Royal Commission, and the APRA prudential inquiry into the CBA, the Principles make clear that the senior executive team is responsible for providing the board with accurate, timely and clear information regarding not only financial performance, but also compliance with material legal and regulatory requirements, and any conduct that is materially inconsistent with the entity’s values or code of conduct.

The area of environmental and social risks was another which saw a change from the third to the fourth edition. The commentary to revised recommendation 7.4 (“a listed entity should disclose whether it has any material exposure to environmental or social risks and, if does, how it manages or intends to manage those risks”), now asks entities that believe that they do not have any material exposure to environmental or social risks to “consider carefully their basis for that belief and to benchmark their disclosures in this regard against those made their peers”.

Consistent with the approach taken by regulators like ASIC and APRA over recent years, the Principles now also encourage (rather than require) listed entities with material exposure to climate change risk to consider implementing the recommendations of the Financial Stability Board’s Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures.

30% female directors
In a boost for promoting greater diversity on boards, for the first time, the Principles will see a hard-coded target of 30% female directors applied to the ASX 300 (revised Recommendation 1.5). The move follows on from a year that finished with the AICD’s target of 30% female representation on ASX 200 boards being almost achieved (29.7%). Australia is the first country in the world to achieve 30% gender diversity in top 100 boardrooms without regulatory intervention or quotas.

On corporate reporting, new recommendation 4.3 requires entities to disclose their process for verifying the integrity of any periodic corporate report released to the market that is not audited or reviewed by an external auditor. This final position saw a slight shift in language from the consultation draft in which the use of the word “validate” had made some question whether prospectus level processes were being required (which was not intended by the Council secretariat).

Other changes
The revised Principles also contain a range of other changes including:

Generally, requiring policies to be disclosed in full, not in summary form;
Amending commentary under indicators of ‘independence’ (Recommendation 2.3) to broaden personal ties to ‘family, friendship or other social or business connections’;
Increasing expectations on director professional development and induction processes (Recommendation 2.6);
Requiring all material ASX announcements to be sent to directors promptly after they have been made (new Recommendation 5.2);
Specifying that all substantive resolutions at a meeting of security holders should be decided by a poll rather than a show of hands (new Recommendation 6.4); and
Amending commentary on remuneration (Recommendation 8.1) to reference the need for listed entities to ensure that incentives encourage senior executives to pursue the growth and success of the entity without rewarding conduct that is contrary to the entity’s values or risk appetite, and to consider the implications for its reputation and standing in the community if it is seen to pay excessive remuneration.
There are also two recommendations that apply only to a small subset of listed entities (additional disclosure obligations for boards with non-English speaking directors, new Recommendation 9.1; and requiring security holder meetings for entities established outside of Australia to be held at a reasonable place and time, new Recommendation 9.2).

We encourage companies coming on to the PCP platform to be aware of these principels and start to adopt them particularly if you are considering stepping from PCP to ASX.
detailed paper is here to download >>> cgc-principles-and-recommendations-fourth-edn

Subscribe to our newsletter